Bydio

I’m not against the Federal Reserve (well, maybe a little), but I am against the overregulation and meddling that know-nothing politicians force on our economy, usually to benefit “the poor”, and it ends up helping unscrupulous businessmen who often times are former or soon-to-be government functionaries.  All of the boondoggles foisted upon the public out of guilt and a “need to do something, anything” end up biting us in the ass, and I’m sick of it. This is one of the reasons why I don’t like any of the popular politicians because they will just keep going with the poor policy choices and looting of the treasury that’s been going on for so many decades.

Regulation is inevitable, but pushing policy on quasi-gov’t agencies, which then force a whole financial system to go into paroxysms is completely unacceptable. Check out this: http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/wall-street-says-thanks/ and follow the link to read the whole thing.  Hell, here’s the link to the whole thing: http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/09/uncle-sam-the-e.html — and here’s the PDF: http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/files/a_memo_found_in_the_street.pdf

And if you dare to delve into the true gloom and doom, check out Nouriel Roubini’s site: http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/

Aussie Dave, who writes the blog Israellycool.com, agrees with a commenter who says Richard Silverstein selling his children’s photos equals pedophilia.

“I am not stupid enough to suggest Richard Silverstein - as loathsome as his views and his treatment of people with whom he disagrees are - is a pedophile. But I do find it offputting that he would be offering for sale personal pictures - including those of his children - given the very real risk that pedophiles could purchase them.”

Wow, I didn’t know Aussie Dave was that stupid. So now all pictures of children are used for child molesting purposes? Better tell all those news outlets and magazines that use pictures of children to enhance a story about things involving children that they are just evil smut peddlers.

Aussie Dave is now flying the dumbass flag.

I don’t like Richard Silverstein’s positions, but his selling pictures of his kids — fully clothed, no less — does NOT equal pedophilia or any encouragement thereof.  Seriously, you have to be brain damaged to think like that, or agree with a position supporting that thesis. I hope it was just Aussie Dave being angry with Silverstein and therefore overreacting, because if this is actually Aussie Dave’s position, he just lost a lot of credibility.

Check out this one for sale.  Sweet.

58Hancock.com

A lot of people are talking about which candidate is more qualified to be President of the United States of America.  Fact is, they’re all qualified.  Every natural born citizen of the United States who is over 35 is qualified to be President.

If you think experience in office is the best way to judge a person’s ability to lead, then McCain is your guy.  If you think charisma and inspiration is more important, then Obama is your guy.  For the Vice Presidential nominees, overall experience would go to Biden, but if executive experience is more important to you, then Palin is your gal.

I think all the candidates would be just fine as POTUS when it come to being a manager.  No worse or better than any other President we’ve had.  However, when it comes to the direction in which each candidate will want to lead the country, I don’t like any of them.  They’re all the same breed of politician, and I think the status quo is quite stale.

I like the Libertarians because there’s a philosophy I mostly support behind each candidate, and I like knowing that the candidate subscribes to that philosophy before being allowed to run for the party.  I don’t think there’s a philosophy for either the Democrats or the Republicans, so they can do whatever is in their own best interests without any qualms or any sense of betrayal to their party, their constituents or themselves.

Yes, everyone is qualified to be President of the United States of America, regardless of experience, beliefs or health.  The trick is, you have to convince the rest of us that you’re good enough to lead the most powerful nation on Earth.

This is in response to a post on LakelandLocal.com.  I also put this in the comments section under the post to which I was responding.

When I get to the polling place and cast my vote, I like to be informed of what I’m voting for.  Too many times I’ve gone into the booth and simply guessed at who I would like to have in office.

I wonder if many other people have the same questions I have.

I got the sample ballot in the mail… it’s simple, but not all that easy to understand.  One side is the Democratic ballot, the other is the Republican ballot, and on the back is the non-partisan ballot.

Question 1: So does that mean, being a registered Libertarian, that I don’t have a ballot?

Inside the sample ballot there are a few races to decide.  Let’s assume I’m a Democrat and see what I’m offered.

The first is CONGRESSIONAL - only the following precincts vote in the Congressional District Five primary race: 101, 102, 106, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120.

Question 2: How do I know if I can vote for a District Five candidate, or if I’m even in District Five?

Question 3: Assuming I’m in District Five, how do I know what precinct I’m in?

Underneath the precinct numbers we have the following: REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT 5 (Vote for One):
- Carol Castagnero
- John Russell
- H. David “the flag-pole sitter” Werder

Assuming I’ve answered Questions 2 and 3, now I need to know a couple more things.

Question 4: What Congressional race am I voting for here? State or Federal?

Sure, seems simple to figure out, but why should I have to figure it out? Why isn’t it clearly marked that this is a Florida State Congressional race?

Question 5: Who are these people?

I need to know who these people are and especially how they stand on the issues.  Which leads to a very general but important question:

Question 6: What are the issues?

What’s important in Lakeland, Polk County, Florida, the USA?  Are any of these issues general interest, specific to a certain region, or are there issues that aren’t being addressed that should be addressed?

Sure, one could just say, “read the paper,” but that’s not the point.  The point is on what issues these people who want to be elected will focus, and if they’re important to me.  Which leads to:

Question 7: What is each person’s platform?

This will apply to everyone on the ballot, so I’d repeat that question for each and every name.  It’s a BIG question.  So where do I find out these people’s positions?  The last time I went to the supervisor of elections website it turned out to be fairly useless for this question.  The Ledger might help — either in print or on the web site — but again, the last time I went to check out candidates on the Ledger site, it wasn’t as helpful as I hoped it would be.

Under the names of the District 5 candidates there’s the following: Only the following precincts vote in the Congressional District Fifteen primary race: 103, 104, 105, 123, 401, 402, 406.

So again, I need to know what district and precinct I’m in.

Stephen Blythe and Paul Rancatore are running for this one.  Who are they?  Where do they stand?  SHould I give a damn?

Then we come to COUNTY.  County Commissioner District 1 Universal Primary Contest.

Now I need to know what a County Commissioner does, how that job affects me, and the positions of the four candidates.  I notice they’re all Republican, too, even though it’s on the Democratic ballot.  That could be confusing.

County Commissioner District 5.  Same general questions need to be answered.

Next is NONPARTISAN.  The first in this group is CIRCUIT JUDGE, 10TH CIRCUIT GROUP 19.  Do I vote for this office or not?  Do I have to find out what judicial circuit I’m in?  What are the positions of these two candidates?  Is there anything else I need to know about them, like are they under investigation, have they been controversial in their position if there’s an incumbent, are they in private practice and if so are they in good standing?  All this involves not only what they say — their campaign promises — but some journalism to see if what they say is the truth.

Then there’s SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER DISTRICT 4.  What does a school board member do?  What are these people’s positions?  How does what they do affect me?

Next is PROPERTY APPRAISER.  What is an elected Property Appraiser?  How will this position affect my life?  Are the people running qualified, and what are the qualifications for the office?

Next is LAKE REGION LAKES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and a bunch of precincts.  I have to know if I’m part of this or not, and if I am, I have to vet the candidates.

Now we come to PARTY OFFICES.  What does that mean?

Precinct 312 Committeewoman and Precinct 527 Committeewoman.  Do I have to vote for this person?  By “committeewoman” does this mean that this is a position for women only, or does the wording only reflect the fact that five women — no men — are running for these offices?  If I do have to vote for them, what are their positions, etc.?

Now for the Republican side of the sample ballot.  We have the same two Congressional races in the same districts and precincts.  However, on this side, there’s a new section called LEGISLATIVE.  One is for District 64 and a whole bunch of precincts and the other is for District 79 and only four precincts. This says it’s for STATE LEGISLATURE.  Why do the Republicans have a Legislative section while the Democrats don’t?  Is it because only Republicans are running for those seats?

For County Commissioner, the Republican ballot has an extra district to vote for besides Districts 1 and 5, District 3.  Again, I wonder why?

Same NONPARTISAN and same LAKES sections, so the standard “who are these people” applies.

For the NONPARTISAN sample ballot on the back, there’s the Universal Primary Contest that the Democrat and Republican ballots have, the NONPARTISAN section of the Democrat and Republican sections, and only SEAT 2 for the LAKE REGION LAKES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT section.

TO conclude, I’d like to vote accurately for candidates I support, but when I don’t know how to find out what they stand for and what their past performance has been, there’s no way I can make an educated choice.  I’m sure plenty of people have these same questions, so it would be great if there was a place to put it ALL together and allow me to find out who I’m voting for.  The Ledger is the only place that has come close to that, but I still found it lacking in essential information.

The basics must be addressed: what is my precinct and district, what are the offices and how do they affect me, and who are the candidates, what are their positions, and are they being truthful.  Along with mail-in ballots and hopefully internet access to voting sometime soon, this would go a long way to increase voter turnout and make our candidates more representative of the populace.

Dr Vj T Vailoces in FL; my grandma never saw this doctor’s face, never returned her phone calls, but he charged her Medicare $700. WTF?!

Don LaFontaine died September 1st?! CRAP! http://tinyurl.com/yruh6o

This is from an email I sent that got nailed by Comcast’s spam servers:

Have you not seen the feeding frenzy in the news that is Sarah Palin? OY! From calling her a bad mother for many reasons (flying while pregnant, running for VP with handicapped child, Trig is actually the daughter’s child, Bristol pregnant at 17, etc.) to claiming she’s had an extramarital affair (resulting in the downs syndrome child), supposed bikini and nude photos that were faked (Snopes - Not Safe For Work) and giving her crap after her speech when all but two of the news pundits covering the RNC complained that she used speech writers. Anderson Cooper, of all people, had to mention that no one complained about speech writers when Barack finished his speech.

Here’s a good letter about Palin on Snopes.

“Oh sure, you Republican, of course you’d defend her.” Nope, I’m a Libertarian, and Palin seems to be the typical politician, voting for the bridge to nowhere before voting against it. She also seems to know politics very well, as she’s getting a LOT of Fed money sent to Alaska. Hired the right lobbyists, I guess.

As for Barack, I’ll never vote for him, and the main reason is because of his 20 years at a black liberation church under the tutelage of Rev. Wright. If Obama can stand 20 years of that AND defend Wright’s racist and supremacist words by saying he’ll never leave the church because there’s more to Rev. Wright than what we’ve seen…? Hell no. Might as well call a despicable Klan member like David Duke a “uniter”.

Black and Latino racism (La Raza: The Race) is making itself more mainstream, and I won’t encourage any of it.

Then there’s McCain — the First Amendment Slayer — with his McCain-Feingold Act, and Biden who plagiarized a British politician for a speech, as well as a law review article when he was in law school (which helped kill his presidentail campaign back in 1988).

Seems I’m still voting Libertarian. At least there’s a philosophy behind that party.

*****

Previous emails from others that led to the above:

Although I find his choice of Palin laughable from a substance standpoint, you can’t argue that he hit a 5-run home run with her. I think he figured, like the rest of us with an IQ over 75, that there was NO way he was going to beat Obama…..so he said, “Why the fuck not?” So far….it has worked for him. The question is, “What happens the FIRST time she misspeaks on the campaign trail? or worse……What happens when stories of her past (if there is anything) start making their way into the news.

As much as I don’t want to see McCain in there, I get VERY nervous when an underdog Republican enters the home stretch in a Presidential race. After Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry……who all had commanding leads…..blew it……who can blame me? This race is already tighter than one would have imagined given what the Republicans have done over the past 8 years. There is still a significant percentage of Americans who wouldn’t vote for a Black man if he was passing out free Lexuses. On the other side, there is a significant percentage of woman who will vote for a female….regardless of her platform and agenda….just to break that ice once and for all. Couple those 2 facts with the Republican party’s history for making the Democratic opponent look like a fool between the conventions and the election……and there’s plenty to worry about.

And, I received this mere minutes after the Obama acceptance speech…

John McCain should just give up now and save himself and everyone the trouble. Nobody’s stopping this guy!

Now Hannah is sideswiping me in Central Florida. It’s weaker than Fay and Gustav. The Vortex protects all! (inside joke)

If Barrack Obama is “The One”, then is Joe Biden “The Deuce”? BWAHAHAHAHA Bathroom humor WIN!