Taxpayers For Common Sense - Outrageous Congressional Earmarks

I got this from This Is True newsletter:

BONZER WEB SITE OF THE WEEK: http://www.taxpayer.net — Taxpayers for Common Sense. A non-partisan U.S. budget watchdog, TCS notes that 11 out of 24 major federal agencies cannot pass a financial audit. TCS tracks “earmarks” — porky add-ons to bills that eat up billions of tax dollars for questionable purposes. Like what? How about $2.4 billion for ten C-17 cargo aircraft that the Pentagon didn’t ask for? (Why? Because it brought money to the district of the congressman who threw that into the defense appropriation bill.) Or $223 million for a bridge to a small local airport and fewer than 100 constituents living on island in Alaska — that’s already well served by a ferry line. Despite recent reforms, the problem is getting worse. In 1996 there were 300 earmarks attached to the Federal Budget. In 2006 there were 12,000. This year there are more than 32,000 earmark requests up for approval in the House of Representatives alone, leading to ever-more corruption among our elected officials. It has to stop; TCS is a good place to learn about what’s going on, and how you can help to stop it. It’s time that we DEMAND common sense.
– Bonzer Sites archive: http://www.BonzerSites.com

[emphasis above is mine] Cassingham is kinda tough on content thieves like myself, but I’m hoping the link to bonzersites.com will prevent harsh rebuke.  Besides, it’s an important issue and he summed it up well.

Ass Raped (Lubeless) By The Telephone Company

Cringely rules information.  Read the short article that tells about how U.S. consumers have been destroyed by the telcos - The $200 Billion Rip-Off.

And the upshot is that I could move to Japan and pay $14 per month for
100-megabit-per-second Internet service but I can’t do that here and
will probably never be able to
.

Housing Bubbles Past

Personal Story by a Lawyer from a Previous Asset Bubble

Hard to believe and even conceptualize a time when prudence and financial discipline were esteemed. This is the sad account of many folks being demoralized and unable to recuperate a substantial nest egg to retire. Their main concern shifted to providing the basic necessities for their family. Keep in mind that the majority of Americans store their wealth in home equity. Many people that grew up during the depression seem frugal and downright strict with their budgets and lifestyles. It left a visual scar on their psyche. How could it not? We look at our current culture and hear prominent financial gurus telling people to walk away from their home if they have no equity. Just leave. Don’t try to fight to keep it. Default and declare bankruptcy if necessary. My main question is who will pay the eventual bill? If you say the government then that means you will be paying back for the mass irresponsibility of financial institutions, imprudent government policy, and the mass greed of many. Unfortunately, this bubble will affect everyone in some form since all of us need shelter and this credit bubble was built on the over appraisal of a shingled laden roof over your head.

No Amnesty, No National ID

I’m against the Immigration bill that was recently defeated but will soon be resurrected.  It does offer basic amnesty to people who have entered the country illegally.  It’s a law issue.

The people screaming about illegal immigration and amnesty, though, seem to have a basic expectation of how things need to be: all citizens need to have proof of citizenship.  This means a national ID.

The root problem here is the value of governmental identification.  Sure it helps to catch people who break the law, forces some responsible action on others who wouldn’t otherwise act responsibly, but at what cost to everyone else?  Identity theft is big business, and the more we rely on government identity, the more valuable these identities become.

But why are they valuable at all?

Our whole system of services is based on being who you say you are.  From opening a bank account (FDIC insured), to applying for a job (employers pay the income taxes), being you is a trillion dollar a year business (ballpark).

The only way to get out of this sputtering Cessna spiral is to eliminate governmental services.

This would be the hardest thing for America, like heroin withdrawal.  We’re so used to having these backups, it’s like they’ve always existed.  They haven’t.  It’s compassion and greed that created these programs, these ubiquitous services, but they are almost all unconstitutional.  We all want to help each other out, it’s part of our nature, the very being of our societies, coming from family, up to community, then expanding that community to encompass our States, our Nation, and our planet.  We all want to help, and sometimes the fastest way — or even the only way — is to use the enormous tax coffers as charity.

Good intentions aside, this leads to horrible things.  We all pay for some things, different things, we don’t want.  With higher taxes we pay for services and institutions that we find intellectually or morally repulsive.  With my taxes, I help to pay for Islamic military campaigns against my fellow countrymen.  We all do.  From Saudi Arabia to Pakistan to Gaza, and many other places inbetween, money that the U.S. government has collected in taxes has helped to fund the expansion of ideals held by people that consider me, my family, my friends, neighbors and fellow citizens as mortal enemies.  It galls me.  This fact alone should stick right in your throat and cause you to question the rationale of anything for which our government pays our hard-earned tax dollars.

Republicans couldn’t control themselves, Democrats have shown they can’t control themselves, it’s just one big spending party once you get elected to office.  This kind of thing should be stopped immediately, and with the harshest of punishments for those who think they are above the rules.

Isn’t it treason to go against the Constitution of the United states of America?  What’s the punishment for treason?

So now I come back to — and sum up — my original point.  Illegal immigration wouldn’t be an issue if there wasn’t a government service industry to protect from fraudulent use.  If you feel you need to keep these services as-is, then we’ll all need a National ID card so anyone can know who is a citizen and who isn’t.  These cards would be tremendously valuable because of the amount of services offered to citizens already, so theft of these cards, a.k.a. identity theft, would rise farther and faster than it does at present, forcing more restrictions on citizens, more biometric information to be handed over, compulsory DNA samples from birth, etc.  Think you could opt out?  Nope.  They’re already doing that in England.  You can’t leave the country legally — get a passport — unless you submit your biometric samples to the government.  And why is all this so important?  Because of the trillions of dollars of services offered by the U.S. government, via YOUR taxes.

Can you muster ANY ire yet?  Are you disgusted with the inevitable future that’s being mapped out at this moment?  It’s not fantasy, it’s actually happening.  It’s not paranoia, or a sci-fi fantasy, it’s being done as I type.

The only way to stop this seeming juggernaut that our good intentions have created is to eliminate the services we let be enacted by our congressional representatives.  Most were certainly done from compassion, but we must always remember that the government — at any level — is not there to be compassionate.  Government is an administration of laws based on the principles set out in the constitutions of the nation and the states within the nation.  Laws enacted that go against the principles set forth should have real consequences to those who try to undermine these principles.

So in my happy world, illegal immigration isn’t an issue if we just eliminate the money element.

This country was founded, and survived well for many, many years, without social services and intercontinental bribery on a leviathanical scale (that’s my word).  We prospered, we traded, we fought against those who transgressed against us.  We won sometimes, we lost sometimes, but never did we say, “You can’t come here unless you’re smart or have something to offer us that we can measure because we can’t afford you.”  Such an idea only 100 years ago would’ve been considered by most to be preposterous.  Today, it’s becoming a legitimate argument.  That argument needs to be delegitimized immediately.

The New Colossus


Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch whose flame
Is imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

“Keep ancient lands your storied pomp!” cries she with silent lips.

“Give me your tired your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”


Emma Lazarus (1849-1887)

Money

So I’m pondering the fact that the U.S. is supplying millions of dollars to a radio station that was supposed to be an Arab “radio free Europe” but has turned into a freakshow of the typical Muslim variety, and the U.S. is allowing many millions of dollars to flow to Hamas, and the U.S. funds this terror organization and the U.S. funds this fuck up organization… and I’m ready to think there’s serious malice aforethought.

But… what if it’s about currency?  I don’t mean that it’s about money — commonly the accumulation of said paper or coin — I’m talking about the reason why we have paper money in the first place.  This paper has to move around or it loses value.  The only value it has is the desire of others to own it, use it, and pass it on.  If it’s stagnant, it loses power.

So all these mistakes, these billions of mistakes — TRILLIONS of mistakes — are necessary.  We’ll sell someone the rope to hang us with because if we don’t sell them the rope, the market for rope will collapse and jobs will be lost, money will stop circulating, and it could lead to a currency coronary.  Guess we’ll just have to keep selling that rope… or buying that oil, or funding that hate group, or buying that weaponry that gets mysteriously lost in transit every single time.  Oops.

Then again, I may be wrong.  I’m no economist.  But it sure sounds good.