Members of Congress channel John McEnroe

In the 1925 case Linder v. United States, Dr. Charles Linder had been convicted for prescribing morphine and cocaine to addicts, which the federal government held was not a legitimate medical practice. Dr. Linder appealed, and the Supreme Court unanimously overturned his conviction, holding the federal government had no such power to regulate the practice of medicine.

“Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government,” wrote Justice James Clark McReynolds for the unanimous court. Even “Incidental regulation of such practice by Congress through a taxing act cannot extend to matters plainly inappropriate and unnecessary to reasonable enforcement of a revenue measure.”

The Linder case is often described as having been partially “overruled or superseded.” But the Constitution has never been amended to authorize such federal regulation. In fact, the rationale of the Linder case was used to stop the Department of Justice from interfering with Oregon’s assisted suicide laws in the 2006 case Gonzales v. Oregon.

via Vin Suprynowicz » Blog Archive » Members of Congress channel John McEnroe.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

Heller Decision Is Being Used Against Gun Owners

Lower Court uses Heller Decision to uphold BATFE ban on imported weapons
In one of the first lower court rulings since the Supreme Court handed down the weakly-worded Heller Decision, a government restriction on firearms has been upheld.

Steven Mullenix, a federal firearms licensee (FFL), was denied permission to import German WWII replica rifles by the notoriously anti-gun Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE). The BATFE used arguments from the 1968 Gun Control Act to argue that the replica BD-44 held no “sporting purpose” and therefore Mr. Mullenix could not legally import them.

In return Mullenix sued the BATFE for infringing upon his right to keep and bear arms, calling their ruling “arbitrary and capricious.”

Just a few short days after the Supreme Court ruled on the Heller Case — the supposed victory for the Second Amendment — the North Carolina Circuit Court used Justice Scalia’s own words to uphold the BATFE’s restriction on firearms importation.

The lower court agreed with the BATFE’s findings that the firearms Mr. Mullenix wanted to import were not “generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.”

They went on to restate the Heller Decision language that the Second Amendment wasn’t unlimited, and that the government has the right to restrict or ban any type of firearm, stating that the right only applies to certain types of firearms.

Clearly, the ripples of the Heller Decision will be felt for years to come. Unfortunately we can only speculate on the future unintended consequences of this weak decision.

This much we do know: the Heller Decision is far from a victory for gun owners. It is already being used successfully to infringe upon the rights of gun owners across the county.

For all the latest Heller Decision related news, click here:
http://www.nationalgunrights.org/truthaboutheller.shtml

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Useful (0) Boring (0) Sucks (0)

Archives